logo
Listen Language Learn
thumb

A Bit of Optimism - Quiet Service with General Stan McChrystal

-
+
15
30

General Stan McChrystal was the Commander of The Joint Special Operations Command under President Obama and is the author of Team of Teams. He has had a colorful and distinguished career, but what I wanted to talk to him about is how he has lived a life of Quiet Service. This… is A Bit of Optimism.

YouTube: http://youtube.com/simonsinek
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/simonsinek
Linkedin: https://linkedin.com/in/simonsinek/
Instagram: https://instagram.com/simonsinek/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/simonsinek
Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/officialsimonsinek/

General
Stan
McChrystal
is
known
for
commanding
the
special
operations
forces
during
the
Obama
years,
and
this
is
when
the
special
operations
forces
were
working
at
maximum
capacity
in
Iraq
and
Afghanistan.
It
created
all
kinds
of
new
problems
of
communication
and
bureaucracy.
And
one
of
the
many
things
he's
known
for
is
actually
helping
figure
out
an
entirely
new
way
in
which
large,
sprawling
organizations
can
keep
everyone
in
the
loop.
But
that's
not
what
I
wanted
to
talk
to
Stan
McChrystal
about.
I
wanted
to
talk
to
him
about
what
it
means
to
serve
quietly
in
a
world
in
which
we
feel
the
need
to
advertise
everything
we
do
on
social
media.
Stan
McChrystal
has
led
a
career
that
very
often
is
behind
the
scenes.
This
is
a
bit
of
optimism.
Stan,
thanks
so
much
for
for
doing
this
for
sure.
Now
you
come
from
a
line
of
soldiers,
were
you
pushed
to
join
the
army
or
did
you
want
to
join
the
army
where
the
inclination
come
because
you
had
the
choice,
I
assume,
to
go
in
one
direction
or
another
for
your
career?
Well,
you're
correct.
My
father
was
a
soldier
and
my
father's
father
was
a
soldier.
My
four
brothers
were
soldiers.
My
sister
married
a
soldier.
I
married
the
daughter
of
a
soldier.
Her
three
brothers
are
soldiers,
her
sisters,
the
widow
of
a
soldier
that
I
served
with.
So
did
anybody
ever
forced
me?
No,
they
didn't
have
to.
As
you've
got
older
one,
I
wanted
to
be
my
dad
because
he
was
my
hero.
But
also
it's
just,
of
course,
this
notion
of
service.
How
did
it
show
up
at
home?
Really
my
mother.
My
father
had
been
in
the
Korean
War,
but
I
was
born
then.
And
then
when
I
was
10,
the
Vietnam
War
started
to
go.
And
he's
got
six
kids
and
he
deployed
to
Vietnam
to
command
an
infantry
battalion.
And
my
mother,
this
is
not
easy.
And
we
weren't
living
on
a
military
base
that
went
to
support
structures
around.
And
we
take
them
to
the
airport
one
day
in
our
old
station
wagon,
dropped
them
off.
And
then
as
we're
driving
back,
I
realized
what
my
mother
had
to
deal
with
now.
And
so
I
watched
her
kind
of
quietly
just
do
what
it
had
to
do
and
talk
to
us.
And
she
wasn't
a
believer
in
the
Vietnam
War.
She
was
very
much
against
it,
but
she
loved
my
father.
And
so
for
that
and
then
his
subsequent
tours.
So
the
sense
that
you
just
bear
the
burden
that
is
your
share,
the
idea
that
if
everybody
has
to
do
something,
you
should
do
yours
and
just
do
it
quietly,
stoically
might
be
the
right
term.
And
my
mother
embodied
that.
I
remember
because
she
went
through
all
of
that.
And
then
just
when
my
dad
made
brigadier
general
and
theoretically
life
would
be
she
died
at
a
very
young
age.
She
just
died
suddenly.
it
was
always
sad
to
me
that
people
don't
look
harder
at
that
demographic
and
say
what
service
really
is,
because
sometimes
it's
not
in
uniform,
even
associated
with
the
military.
Yeah,
we
live
in
a
world
where
I
think
this
idea
of
service
has
either
morphed
or
even,
I
dare
I
say,
be
forgotten.
There
was
a
time
where
service
was
the
norm,
like
chivalry
was
like
the
norm.
And
all
of
the
rules
that
went
with
chivalry
and
giving
someone
your
word
actually
meant
something.
And
the
stories
of
World
War
Two
of
young
men
who
committed
suicide
because
they
weren't
drafted,
where
this
call
to
service
was
the
thing.
And
we
can
discuss
the
reasons,
but
we
can
at
least
say
that
for
some
reason,
this
idea
of
the
draw
to
service
and
the
call
to
service
seems
to
have
declined
in
this
modern
day.
Is
that
a
fair
assessment?
I
think
you're
exactly
correct.
That
sense
of
responsibility
that
I
have
a
number
of
expectations
to
live
up
to
has
decreased.
Now,
in
some
ways
you
say,
well,
everybody's
their
own
person
now.
They
analyze
everything
and
decide
what
to
do.
Well,
the
problem
is
it's
hard
to
run
a
society
like
that.
It's
hard
to
have
collective
defense.
It's
hard
to
have
collective
care
for
those
who
can't
care
for
themselves.
It's
hard
to
have
those
things
which
we
do
better
jointly
than
we
do
individually.
It's
hard
to
make
that
work
unless
people
feel
a
responsibility
for
their
part
of
the
task.
Well,
it
seems
like
America
has
over
indexed
on
rugged
individualism.
It's
an
important
thing
and
it's
a
good
thing.
But
there's
a
balance
and
there's
a
paradox
to
being
human.
I
think
that
every
single
day
we're
both
individuals,
but
we're
also
members
of
groups
and
we
have
a
responsibility
to
both,
which
is
we
have
to
take
care
of
ourselves,
but
we
have
a
responsibility
to
the
group.
And
it's
never
going
to
be
in
perfect
balance
and
it's
never
going
to
be
even
it.
Its
the
seesaw
that
we
have
to
play
with
every
day,
but
it
should
be
in
play
is
the
point.
It
shouldn't
be
lopsided,
the
rugged
individualism
and
you
can
see
it
in
the
rise
of
our
industries.
I
think,
you
know,
there's
an
entire
section
of
the
bookshop
called
self-help
and
there's
no
section
in
the
book
shop
called
Help
Others.
So
we're
all
trying
to
learn
how
to
take
care
of
ourselves.
But
where
are
we
learning
to
take
care
of
each
other,
which
I
think
is
interesting.
I
think
that's
a
great
point.
If
you
think
about
that,
you
know,
if
I
was
to
say,
how
do
you
want
young
Americans
to
find
just
our
country
right
now,
how
do
you
want
them
to
process
that?
Let's
see
if
they're
coming
of
age,
coming
out
of
high
school,
which
should
be
in
their
mind.
Well,
it
doesn't
have
to
be
this
grand
thing.
It
can
be
as
simple
as
I
have
a
responsibility
to
the
fellow
human
being,
to
the
left
and
to
the
right
of
me.
And
I
would
sacrifice
my
interest
to
make
sure
that
they
feel
safe
psychologically
or
physically.
I
think
that's
right.
That's
why
I'm
so
passionate
about
civilian
national
service
for
young
Americans,
because
I
think
you
can
plant
a
seed
through
behavior,
getting
them
to
do
something
for
a
year,
inspiring
them.
Yeah,
they
won't
like
it
every
day,
but
they
will
come
out
of
it
differently
and
come
out
of
it
more
thought
and
to
be.
Clear,
when
you're
talking
about
national
service,
we're
not
necessarily
talking
about
military
could
be
Teach
for
America,
it
could
be
absolutely
anything
that
is
about
serving
society.
It's
particularly
not
military
because
reality
is
not
everybody's
rights
the
military.
We
don't
need
that
big
a
military.
If
we
started
to
make
military
big
enough
just
to
give
everybody
a
place,
that
would
be
a
mistake.
Instead,
health
care,
the
environment,
education,
there's
so
much
room
for
people
to
go
in
for
a
year
or
two
give.
And
then
when
they
leave,
they
come
out
differently
themselves.
They're
the
real
product.
Yeah,
I
think
we
have
to
have
a
constellation
of
opportunities,
some
very
local,
some
national
and
international
young
people
can
go
with
those
and
we've
got
to
have
it
pay
because
otherwise
only
families
who
can
support
their
kid
can
give
the
opportunity.
And
we've
got
to
make
it
full
time.
It's
got
to
be
an
immersive
experience.
You
can't
be
two
hours
every
Saturday.
It's
got
to
disrupt
your
life
a
bit.
The
other
part
is
recognizing
the
value
of
the
experience
because
people
come
out
more
discipline,
more
experience.
And
so
universities
ought
to
give
preferential
admission
to
people
who've
done
service
companies
need
to
give
preferential
hiring.
Does
it
mean
that,
you
know,
you
go
to
the
front
of
the
line
everywhere,
but
it
means
you
get
credit
for
that?
It's
like
coming
out.
You're
a
veteran
of
sorts
because
military
and
civilian
service
ought
to
be
two
sides
of
the
same
coin.
But
at
the
end
of
the
day,
you're
getting
a
better
human
being.
You're
getting
a
better
employee.
I
think
a
lot
of
young
people,
there's
the
sense
of
impatience,
you
know,
like
I
got
to
get
my
career
going.
I
love
the
idea
of
volunteering
for
two
years
of
doing
something,
you
know,
teaching
in
a
school
somewhere
in
America
or
volunteering
for
health
care
or
whatever.
But
I
feel
like
I'm
going
to
lose
two
years.
Other
people
will
get
ahead
of
me
in
this
competition
if
I
go
do
that.
David,
Mark
does
some
interesting
work
where
there's
this
belief
to
change
behavior.
First
you
have
to
change
someone's
thinking
and
then
they'll
change
their
behavior.
And
we
see
this
in
companies.
You
give
the
PowerPoint,
you
explain
what
we're
doing,
and
then
you
hope
people
will
come
along.
And
his
work
has
found
that,
no,
you
force
a
change
in
behavior
and
then
people
change
their
thinking.
So
mandating
national
service
people
will
come
along
and
realize
how
great
it
is.
He's
exactly
right.
The
other
conversation
we
have
to
get
is
the
one
where
someone
wants
to
run
for
office.
And
so
they
are
bright,
young
and
charismatic
and
ambitious.
And
they
get
in
front
of
a
bunch
of
people
and,
I
want
to
be
your
congressman.
And
someone
says,
OK,
how
did
you
serve?
And
they
look
down
at
their
shoes
and
they
go,
wow,
you
know,
I
was
in
this
school,
in
law
school
and
I
didn't.
And
they
go,
Why
are
you
running
for
office?
Get
out
of
here.
I
think
that
would
be
very
powerful.
I
mean,
it's
true.
And
we
see
this
in
our
politicians.
Right,
which
is
this
is
our
complaint
about
politicians.
Are
they
there
to
serve
us?
Are
they
there
to
win
the
game
and
serve
themselves?
I
mean,
where
did
they
come
from?
Yeah,
it
also
strikes
me
there's
plenty
of
shared
struggle
right
now
in
the
United
States.
How
come
we're
not
coming
together
the
way
we
should
be?
I
mean,
we
seem
to
be
dividing
in
the
struggle
rather
than
coalescing
in
the
struggle.
And
do
I
have
a
romantic
view
of
the
way
it
used
to
be
or
is
there
actually
something
different
now?
I
have
the
same
view
as
you
think
about
it.
If
you
had
written
a
movie
about
what
would
unite
the
world,
what
you
would
do
is
you'd
create
an
external
threat.
Typically,
think
of
one
of
those
movies
where
aliens
come
and
the
world
for
the
first
time
in
a
long
time
unites
and
it
fights
off
the
aliens
and
everything's
good
covid-19
like
that.
It's
something
everybody
could
hate.
Nobody's
going
to
love
a
virus
that
kills
people.
And
it
was
a
great
opportunity
to
unite
us
internally
and
externally.
You
can't
blame
it
on
anybody.
And
yet
the
opposite
has
happened.
What
we've
done
is
we've
gone
into
smaller
entities
almost
tribally
and
linked
arms
and
we've
done
that.
And
as
a
consequence,
we've
done
two
things.
One,
we've
been
much
less
effective
than
we
needed
to
be.
And
second,
we've
missed
the
opportunity
to
have
a
unifying
theme
that
brings
us
together.
And
absent
that,
it's
pretty
easy
for
societies
to
fragment.
And
that's
what
I
think
is
so
dangerous
right
now.
Now,
it's
also
an
opportunity.
There's
a
lot
of
people
having
a
conversation
we
are
right
now.
And
so
I'm
hoping
that
because
that
conversation
is
going
on,
that
there
are
people
saying,
OK,
where
we
have
to
do
it.
It
raises
the
interesting
question
of
sort
of
to
use
a
modern
term
to
put
on
it.
But
branding,
you
look
at
the
quote
unquote
threats
that
we
face
and
they've
had
really
bad
branding,
like
we
call
it,
you
know,
global
warming.
Well,
but
we
had
a
really
bad
winter.
And
I
thought
you
told
me
it
was
warming
or
we
call
it
climate
change.
But
people
confuse
the
weather
and
the
climate.
They're
not
the
same
thing.
And
why
didn't
we
call
it
climate
cancer?
That
sounds
a
lot
worse
to
me.
We've
done
a
terrible
job
at
communicating
this
existential
threat.
And
so
we're
not.
Coming
together
as
a
people
and
you
know
this
for
military,
which
is
there
is
a
sense
of
branding
the
enemy
to
brand
the
enemy
as
this
disconnected
threat
that
they
no
longer
human
there,
there
are
now
a
threat.
And
so
I
wonder
if
we
have
a
responsibility.
Leaders
have
a
responsibility
to
better
communicate
the
threats
that
we
have
rather
than
explaining
them.
Yeah,
but
it
seems
to
me
that
there's
been
a
failure
of
communication
from
our
leaders
to
help
us
understand
the
importance
of
these
existential
threats
that
would
make
us
come
together
as
a
community.
Yeah,
I
think
that's
true.
If
you
think
of
the
war
on
poverty
that
President
Johnson
pushed
and
that
was
pretty
clear,
you
know,
it
was
unevenly
executed,
but
it's
pretty
clear.
And
now
if
we
think
about
the
push
for
equality
in
our
society,
it's
kind
of
hard
to
be
against
philosophically,
against
the
fact
that
everyone
should
have
equal
opportunity.
Yeah,
but
we
have
not
been
able
to
explain
that
in
a
way
where
that's
what
we're
forcing
people
to
to
talk
about.
We're
talking
about
other
things.
And
what
we
should
be
talking
about
is
the
idea
that
every
young
person
gets
a
roughly
equal
start,
roughly
equal
opportunity
in
life
and.
That's
never
going
to
be
perfect,
but
it
should
be
our
goal.
You
shouldn't
be
able
to
argue
against
that.
I
think
that's
such
an
interesting
point,
which
is
to
raise
the
conversation.
We're
down
in
the
weeds
and
there's
a
bigger
idea
here.
And
Black
Lives
Matter
has
sparked
something
that
is
innate
in
all
of
us,
which
is
we
believe,
in
fairness,
a
little
child,
my
little
nephew,
you
know,
something
happens
and
he'll
scream
out
to
me
that's
unfair.
Like
it's
innate.
We
have
a
sense
of
fairness
in
all
of
us.
And
the
question
is,
is
how
do
we
advance
this
sense
of
to
your
point,
everybody
gets
roughly
the
same
start.
What
you
do
with
your
start
is
is
up
to
you,
I
guess.
But
I
don't
even
know
if
that's
true.
That's
what
Black
Lives
Matter
is
highlighted,
which
is
OK,
fine
with
the
good
and
fair
start.
But
it's
not
a
fair
ride.
It's
not
a
fair
journey.
But
I
do
really
appreciate
this
idea
of
raising
the
conversation.
But
who
it's
a
great
question.
I
mean,
let's
talk
health
care,
for
example.
I
think
the
conversation
should
start
with
every
citizen
is
going
to
get
health
care,
adequate
health
care
for
their
whole
life.
And
people
say,
well,
wait
a
minute,
are
we
talking
about
single
payer
Obamacare?
Any
number
of
permutations
say,
no,
we're
not
talking
about
any
of
that.
What
we're
talking
about
right
now
is
do
you
agree
with
the
idea
that
everybody
gets
health
care?
If
they're
bleeding,
they
get
bandaged.
If
they're
sick,
they
get
taken
care
of
and
all
the
things
you
need
and
people,
again,
will
go,
well,
yeah,
OK.
Of
course
they'd
be
careful
because
when
you
get
into
how
you
get
in
the
arguments.
But
if
we
could
get
a
general
agreement
that
says
every
American
gets
health
care,
not
just
because
it's
fair,
but
because
it's
smart
for
society,
it
makes
us
a
better
society,
then
you
start
to
work
toward
it.
I
think
Obama
made
a
mistake
when
he
communicated
this.
I've
gone
back
and
watched.
He
gave
a
speech
to
a
joint
session
of
Congress,
one
of
the
first
times
he
was
making
a
national
argument
for
national
health
care.
And
he
made
a
rational
argument.
You
know,
there
are
30
million
uninsured
Americans,
you
know,
kind
of
how
the
speech
started,
which
to
anybody
sounds
big
and
complicated
and
sounds
expensive
as
opposed
to
going
to
the
foundations
of
the
United
States.
You
know,
he
could
have
stood
up
and
said,
our
founding
fathers
founding
this
nation
on
three
basic
principles.
All
men
are
created
equal,
endowed
with
unalienable
rights
amongst
which
include
life,
liberty
and
the
pursuit
of
happiness.
Let's
let's
talk
about
one
of
those.
Let's
just
talk
about
life.
The
United
States
is
the
wealthiest
nation
on
earth.
The
United
States
has
the
most
powerful
nation
on
earth.
Only
our
president
is
referred
to
as
the
leader
of
the
free
world.
Then
how
is
it
that
America
has
one
of
the
highest
infant
mortality
rates
amongst
Western
nations?
How
is
it
that
we
can
claim
to
provide
life
for
all
of
our
citizens
and
yet
we
cannot
even
provide
a
doctor
for
every
child?
There
are
30
million
uninsured
Americans.
And
I
think
that,
again,
goes
back
to
a
failure
of
communication.
He
did
not
tap
into
a
sense
of
shared
something
or
other
that
all
Americans
have,
regardless
of
color,
creed
and
politics.
He
went
straight
into
let
me
explain
something
to
you.
And
I
think
this
is
where
our
leaders
and
our
politicians
have
failed
this.
Everybody
to
explain
things
to
us.
I
mean,
you
know,
this
war
history,
America
is
losing
the
psychological
and
social
fight
in
Vietnam.
And
they're
having
press
conferences
saying
how
well
they're
doing
in
battle.
Like
the
numbers
don't
matter.
Yeah.
You
know,
we
lost
58000
men.
They
lost
three
million
people.
How
did
we
lose?
Right.
Because
we
kept
talking
about
it
rationally.
It
doesn't
work.
And
I
think
there's
a
complete
breakdown
in
this
nation
of
how
we
are
able
to
connect
with
people,
how
we
explain
things
or
inspire.
Right.
And
so
here's
the
challenge.
What
should
leaders
be
doing?
Like
how
the
heck
are
we
going
to
inspire
people
to
want
to
do
something
that
comes
at
personal
sacrifice?
Yeah,
I
think
people
want
to
be
inspired.
The
one
thing
that
I
think
is
true
is
they
desperately
want
to
be
inspired.
They're
just
sort
of
waiting
to
be
asked.
Yeah,
I
think
Black
Lives
Matter
is
important
on
so
many
levels.
There's
the
obvious
one
that
we
need
to
reconcile
and
hold
a
mirror
up
to
ourselves
as
a
society
and
and
sort
of
admit
we
need
to
do
a
lot
better.
But
I
think
it's
provided
an
opportunity
for
people
to
show
up.
You
know,
I
think
people
forget
that
the
Internet
is
not
what
changes.
Society
know
Mubarak
was
not
overthrown
by
Twitter.
He
was
overthrown
by
the
thousands
and
thousands
and
thousands
of
people
who
showed
up
in
Tahrir
Square.
It
requires
people
to
physically
show
up.
And
it's
one
of
the
things
I
love
about
this
youngest
generation,
Gen
Z
is
they're
not
online
activists.
They
show
up
and
they
organize
and
they're
having
strikes
from
school
to
make
a
point.
And
they're
building
rallies
themselves.
They're
an
activist
generation.
And
maybe
this
activist
generation
is
in
response.
It
is
the
pendulum
to
the
slacktivism
that
has
preceded
them.
Yeah,
so
and
as
I
said,
the
Black
Lives
Matter
movement,
it's
been
a
long
time
since
America
has
had
a
movement,
you
know,
where
people
came
out
on
the
streets
and
protested
in
massive,
massive
numbers
at
personal
risk,
I
might
add.
And
I
agree
with
you
on
that
completely.
The
one
thing
if
I
was
advising
Black
Lives
Matter
is
because
I've
written
and
studied
the
civil
rights
movement.
They
need
to
make
sure
they're
not
thinking
about
this,
like
about.
It's
a
war,
and
so
they
have
got
to
have
enough
persistent
pressure
on
the
system
because
we
both
know
our
country
well
enough
that
there'll
be
a
certain
response
and
then
as
soon
as
the
pressure
goes
down,
there
will
be
stop
progress
and
in
fact,
there
be
some
encroachment
back.
And
so
they
need
to
understand
that
Martin
Luther
King
Jr.
did
it
for
13
years
till
he
was
murdered
and
then
other
people
led
the
movement.
After
that.
It
takes
constant,
inexorable
pressure.
Well,
it
goes
back
to
our
impatience
as
a
society
with
younger,
impatient
generations.
I
got
to
get
my
career
started
and
I
got
to
see
change
now.
And
some
of
that's
true.
But
as
you
said,
societal
change,
sticky
societal
change
that
can
survive
the
machinations
of
a
political
cycle
takes
time.
Can
you
share
a
specific
story
that
you
went
through,
something
we
can
relive
with
you,
where
you
came
out,
a
different
version
of
yourself?
Yeah,
I
was
a
captain
for
about
seven
years,
so
I
had
about
10
years
in
the
Army
and
the
first
time
in
the
army.
When
you
can
be
promoted
early,
you
get
an
accelerated
promotion
is
to
major.
And
so
this
board
was
coming
up
and
I
was
going
to
be
considered,
along
with
thousands
of
other
captains,
and
I
didn't
think
much
about
it.
You
know,
I
didn't
really
think
about
it,
but
I'd
had
all
the
right
jobs.
In
fact,
I
was
already
in
a
major
job
and
people
were
telling
me
how
cool
I
was
and
how
well
I
was
doing.
And
so
part
of
me
inside
was
going,
hey,
you
know,
I'm
the
kind
of
guy
they
pick
early.
And
our
day
I
was
discount.
That's
the
list
came
out.
And
my
battalion
commander
called
me
and
he
said,
you're
not
on
the
majors
list.
And
I
said,
OK,
I
can
live
with
that.
I
was
hurt,
but
it
was
crushing
until
I
saw
the
list
and
literally
all
my
friends
were
on
the
list.
Or
it
seemed
like
it
seemed
like
every
other
captain
that
I
knew
really
well
was
and
I
was
not.
And
so
now
not
being
on
was
really
noteworthy.
And
so
it
crushed
me.
And
I
remember
my
wife
had
been
married
three
years
now.
But
one
of
the
things
she
said,
it
goes,
OK,
you
didn't
make
it.
So
what
are
you
going
to
do?
You're
going
to
get
out
of
the
army
and
I
said
no.
And
she
says,
well
then
you've
got
to
get
over
it,
because
if
you're
not
going
to
get
out
and
I
came
away
with
this
lifelong
thing,
I
repeat
to
other
people,
I
said,
you
know,
every
once
in
a
while,
if
you
get
selected
for
promotion,
you
say,
wow,
the
promotion
board
is
really
smart
because
they
picked
me.
And
I
started
reminding
myself
that
later
when
I
got
picked
for
promotions,
I
said
the
board
that
picked
me
was
no
smarter
than
the
board
that.
And
so
I
need
to
take
any
success
with
the
same
grain
of
salt.
I
need
to
be
as
dismissive
of
the
process
as
I
was
when
I
didn't
get
selected.
It
was
good
to
happen
so
early
in
my
career
because
it
was
a
real
slap
back
into
humility
that
is
so
great.
And
I'm
realizing
just,
you
know,
when
something
goes
our
way,
we
think
how
smart
those
people
are
and
how
good
those
people
are.
And
when
it
doesn't
go
we
think
what
idiots
and
what
poor
leaders
they
are
and
how
they
don't
understand.
And
it's
the
same.
They're
either
idiots
all
the
time.
And
they
picked
you
for
a
promotion
because
they're
idiots
or
they're
smart.
They
know
something
that
you
don't
know.
I
really
like
the
fact
that
we
treated
equally.
That's
such
a
good
one.
There's
a
great
story
that
the
chief
of
staff
of
the
army
once
told,
and
he
said
every
year
they
picked
40
colonels
in
the
army
to
be
brigadier
generals.
And
that's
the
most
difficult
hurdle
to
get
over
twenty
five
hundred
get
looked
at,
40
get
picked.
So
it's
really
the
eye
of
a
needle.
A
lot
of
it's
luck.
And
he
said
he
was
talking
to
a
colonel
one
day
and
he
said,
well,
what
do
you
think
about
this
boy
coming
up?
He
said,
Sir,
you
know,
every
year
when
the
40
person
list
comes
out,
there's
always
one
name
that
everybody
looks
at
and
goes,
how
did
that
idiot
get
on
the
list?
What
a
joke.
And
he
said,
Sir,
I
want
to
be
that
guy.
I
love
it.
I
love
it.
One
of
the
things
that
I
think
most
people
misunderstand
and
misperceive
about
the
military
is,
you
know,
sure,
there's
a
lot
of
testosterone
and
it's
a
machismo
culture,
but
the
intensity
of
humanity
that
exists,
there's
handholding,
there's
hugging,
there's
crying
and
crying
in
the
military
is
fine.
Is
there
someone
you
think
of
a
fallen
comrade
or
a
story
that
you
grew
up
with
that
you
can't
get
through
the
story?
Is
there
something
that
has
stuck
with
you
that
has
become
a
part
of
who
you
are
as
Stan
McChrystal?
This
story,
this
person
in
your
life
has
now
become
a
part
of
your
the
very
way
you
show
up
in
the
world
because
you
knew
them
or
because
of
the
story
you
lived
through.
There
is
Christmas
Eve.
It's
tradition
for
commanders
to
fly
around
and
visit
remote
bases,
Christmas
Eve,
Christmas
Day.
So
I
was
doing
the
Christmas
Eve
and
Christmas
Day.
do
more.
So
it
was
already
dark
and
it
was
Afghanistan.
And
I'm
at
these
little
bases
and
I
landed
at
a
small
little
base,
looked
like
a
just
for
the
Afghanistan
thing,
and
probably
40,
50
Americans
stationed
there
and
70
radio
Afghan
forces
and
together
there
to
secure
this
local
area.
And
so
we
land
outside
and
we
walk
into
the
perimeter
and
we
go
into
the
mess
hall
and
they've
gathered
most
of
the
people
there,
my
sergeant
major,
nine
to
three
others.
And
we
talk
for
a
few
minutes.
Everybody
is
it's
always
the
same.
They're
pretty
tight
at
first.
And
then,
you
know,
you
talk
informally
and
then
the
great,
said,
is
anybody
want
to
take
any
pictures
or
do
anything?
And
then
they'll
want
to
take
pictures
together
and
that
breaks
it
down.
That's
great.
And
so
as
I'm
given
my
comments,
I
see
a
young
private
first
class
and
I
see
the
name.
And
literally
I
just
froze
because
the
name
was
back
and
it
was
a
very
distinct
name.
And
there
had
been
a
Ranger
Sergeant
First
Class
that
I
had
served
with
in
the
Ranger
Regiment.
I
commend
the
regiment.
And
then
he
had
gone
off
to
Delta
Force,
become
an
operator.
And
then
in,
under
my
command,
he
was
killed.
I
knew
Steve
and
his
wife
quite
well.
And
I'm
sitting
there
and
I'm
looking
at
this
guy.
If
this
name
tag
is
distracted
by
my
comments
and
we
went
to
the
pictures,
I
went
over
to
him
and
I
said.
your
father
in
the
service?
And
he
could
figure
out
where
I
was
going
with
this
right
away,
and
he
goes,
yes,
I
said
it
was
your
father,
Perenjori
says,
Yes,
sir.
And
in
that
moment,
what
I
realized
is
we're
seeing
this
generational
service.
His
father
had
been
killed.
This
kid
didn't
have
to
go
in.
The
military
could
have
gone
and
done
anything.
But
not
only
gone
in
the
military
here
he
was
in
this
godforsaken
part
of
Afghanistan
on
Christmas.
His
mom
is
now
home
alone.
You
know,
she'd
been
widowed
at
that
point
for
four
and
a
half
years.
And
I
just
realized
that
he
didn't
come
and
tell
me,
hey,
you
know,
my
dad.
He
wasn't
going
to
do
that,
and
I
just
happened
to
see
it
and
it
reminded
me
what
sort
of
quiet
service
is
would
sacrifice
what
his
father
had
done,
what
his
mother
was
doing,
and
then
what
he
was.
And
so
it's
one
of
those
things
that
whenever
I
think
about
that,
when
people
talk
about,
OK,
you
know,
I'm
doing
my
part,
I
say,
OK,
I'm
sure
you
are.
But
I
put
it
against
that
yardstick.
A
lot
of
the
stories
you
tell
are
of
quiet
service.
You
tell
the
story
of
this
young
man
as
quiet
service.
You
tell
the
story
of
your
mother,
of
quiet
service.
You
distinctly
pointed
out
the
quietness
of
her
service.
You
talk
about
humility.
A
lot
of
the
stories
you
tell
are
about
quiet
and
about
being
humble.
It's
a
theme
in
your
work.
It's
a
theme
in
the
stories.
And
maybe
that's
what
this
is
all
about.
Which
is
maybe
the
reason
we've
lost
the
sense
of
sacrifice
is
because
we're
all
too
busy
advertising
ourselves
now.
Maybe
this
has
nothing
to
do
with
service.
Maybe
the
lack
of
service
is
a
symptom
that
we've
lost
our
humility
as
individuals,
as
a
nation.
You
know,
I
see
that
in
the
resume
building
in
young
people
where
there's
more
resume
than
substance
and
they've
been
encouraged
to
do
that.
I
think
we've
got
a
celebrity
culture
where
we
can
confuse
celebrity
with
competence
or
leadership.
So
I
think
you're
probably
right.
What
I
think
is
so
funny
about
America.
We
celebrate
our
independence
on
July
4th,
1776,
but
we
fought
the
Revolutionary
War
until
the
Treaty
of
Paris
on
September
3rd,
1783.
We
actually
aren't
celebrating
our
independence.
We're
celebrating
the
day
we
declared
our
independence.
Independence
didn't
come
for
another
seven
years
before
the
United
States
was
formally
recognized
as
an
independent
nation.
But
that's
a
very
American
thing.
Yeah,
the
declaration
is
enough.
And
I
think
that,
again,
there's
huge
positives
in
that,
you
know,
Europe
makes
fun
of
us
because
we're
so
optimistic
as
a
nation.
But
I
think
the
downside
of
that
is
we're
sometimes
so
busy
broadcasting
that
we're
not
spending
enough
time
listening.
We're
so
busy
self
promoting
that
sometimes
we're
forgetting
the
substance.
And
maybe
this
is
just
a
point
in
time,
an
inflection
point,
a
necessary
point
for
correction.
And
sometimes
maybe.
Black
Lives
Matter,
it's
that
smack
across
the
face
that
says,
you
know,
maybe
you
should
maybe
should
be
a
little
more
quiet
and
a
little
more
humble,
like
you
didn't
get
everything
right.
America.
Yeah.
You
got
some
things
wrong.
It's
OK.
You
just
got
to
take
account.
You
got
to
make
corrections
and
you
got
to
you've
got
to
learn
your
lesson.
You've
got
to
learn
that
humility.
I
think
there's
something
really
powerful
about
quiet
service.
And
for
somebody
like
you
with
a
storied
career,
you
could
tell
me
any
story
you
wanted.
You
could
have
told
me
a
story
of
heroism
and
machismo
and
somebody
running
to
battle.
And
the
story
you
chose
to
tell
me
that
you
carry
with
you
as
someone
you
want
to
be
like.
Is
this
private
first
class
with
quiet
service,
maybe
we
all
need
to
just
like
do
that
go
serve
as
opposed
to
broadcasting
what
we
served
or
intended
to
do?
Yeah,
Stan,
I
can't
thank
you
enough
and
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
it.
People
can
do
their
own
research
on
your
career,
but
knowing
how
the
circumstances
under
which
you
left
the
army,
you
are
that
private
first
class.
It
was
quiet
and
you
allowed
history
to
tell
the
right
story
and
to
get
the
truth
out
later
on.
I
have
great
respect
for
just
how
quiet
you
are
and
just
put
your
head
down
and
get
the
job
done.
It's
such
a
such
an
honor.
Thanks
for
all
you
do
and
thanks
for
having
me
today.
But
even
more
thanks
for
you.
Do
you
make
people
think
sometimes
that
makes
their
heads
hurt,
but
you
make
me
think
that's
one
of
the
biggest
contributions
you
can
make.
Thank
you,
sir.
I
appreciate
it.
Take
care
some.
If
you
enjoyed
this
podcast
and
if
you'd
like
to
hear
more,
please
subscribe
wherever
you
like
to
listen
to
podcasts.
Until
then,
take
care
of
yourself.
Take
care
of
each
other.
Check out more A Bit of Optimism

See below for the full transcript

General Stan McChrystal is known for commanding the special operations forces during the Obama years, and this is when the special operations forces were working at maximum capacity in Iraq and Afghanistan. It created all kinds of new problems of communication and bureaucracy. And one of the many things he's known for is actually helping figure out an entirely new way in which large, sprawling organizations can keep everyone in the loop. But that's not what I wanted to talk to Stan McChrystal about. I wanted to talk to him about what it means to serve quietly in a world in which we feel the need to advertise everything we do on social media. Stan McChrystal has led a career that very often is behind the scenes. This is a bit of optimism. Stan, thanks so much for for doing this for sure. Now you come from a line of soldiers, were you pushed to join the army or did you want to join the army where the inclination come because you had the choice, I assume, to go in one direction or another for your career? Well, you're correct. My father was a soldier and my father's father was a soldier. My four brothers were soldiers. My sister married a soldier. I married the daughter of a soldier. Her three brothers are soldiers, her sisters, the widow of a soldier that I served with. So did anybody ever forced me? No, they didn't have to. As you've got older one, I wanted to be my dad because he was my hero. But also it's just, of course, this notion of service. How did it show up at home? Really my mother. My father had been in the Korean War, but I was born then. And then when I was 10, the Vietnam War started to go. And he's got six kids and he deployed to Vietnam to command an infantry battalion. And my mother, this is not easy. And we weren't living on a military base that went to support structures around. And we take them to the airport one day in our old station wagon, dropped them off. And then as we're driving back, I realized what my mother had to deal with now. And so I watched her kind of quietly just do what it had to do and talk to us. And she wasn't a believer in the Vietnam War. She was very much against it, but she loved my father. And so for that and then his subsequent tours. So the sense that you just bear the burden that is your share, the idea that if everybody has to do something, you should do yours and just do it quietly, stoically might be the right term. And my mother embodied that. I remember because she went through all of that. And then just when my dad made brigadier general and theoretically life would be she died at a very young age. She just died suddenly. it was always sad to me that people don't look harder at that demographic and say what service really is, because sometimes it's not in uniform, even associated with the military. Yeah, we live in a world where I think this idea of service has either morphed or even, I dare I say, be forgotten. There was a time where service was the norm, like chivalry was like the norm. And all of the rules that went with chivalry and giving someone your word actually meant something. And the stories of World War Two of young men who committed suicide because they weren't drafted, where this call to service was the thing. And we can discuss the reasons, but we can at least say that for some reason, this idea of the draw to service and the call to service seems to have declined in this modern day. Is that a fair assessment? I think you're exactly correct. That sense of responsibility that I have a number of expectations to live up to has decreased. Now, in some ways you say, well, everybody's their own person now. They analyze everything and decide what to do. Well, the problem is it's hard to run a society like that. It's hard to have collective defense. It's hard to have collective care for those who can't care for themselves. It's hard to have those things which we do better jointly than we do individually. It's hard to make that work unless people feel a responsibility for their part of the task. Well, it seems like America has over indexed on rugged individualism. It's an important thing and it's a good thing. But there's a balance and there's a paradox to being human. I think that every single day we're both individuals, but we're also members of groups and we have a responsibility to both, which is we have to take care of ourselves, but we have a responsibility to the group. And it's never going to be in perfect balance and it's never going to be even it. Its the seesaw that we have to play with every day, but it should be in play is the point. It shouldn't be lopsided, the rugged individualism and you can see it in the rise of our industries. I think, you know, there's an entire section of the bookshop called self-help and there's no section in the book shop called Help Others. So we're all trying to learn how to take care of ourselves. But where are we learning to take care of each other, which I think is interesting. I think that's a great point. If you think about that, you know, if I was to say, how do you want young Americans to find just our country right now, how do you want them to process that? Let's see if they're coming of age, coming out of high school, which should be in their mind. Well, it doesn't have to be this grand thing. It can be as simple as I have a responsibility to the fellow human being, to the left and to the right of me. And I would sacrifice my interest to make sure that they feel safe psychologically or physically. I think that's right. That's why I'm so passionate about civilian national service for young Americans, because I think you can plant a seed through behavior, getting them to do something for a year, inspiring them. Yeah, they won't like it every day, but they will come out of it differently and come out of it more thought and to be. Clear, when you're talking about national service, we're not necessarily talking about military could be Teach for America, it could be absolutely anything that is about serving society. It's particularly not military because reality is not everybody's rights the military. We don't need that big a military. If we started to make military big enough just to give everybody a place, that would be a mistake. Instead, health care, the environment, education, there's so much room for people to go in for a year or two give. And then when they leave, they come out differently themselves. They're the real product. Yeah, I think we have to have a constellation of opportunities, some very local, some national and international young people can go with those and we've got to have it pay because otherwise only families who can support their kid can give the opportunity. And we've got to make it full time. It's got to be an immersive experience. You can't be two hours every Saturday. It's got to disrupt your life a bit. The other part is recognizing the value of the experience because people come out more discipline, more experience. And so universities ought to give preferential admission to people who've done service companies need to give preferential hiring. Does it mean that, you know, you go to the front of the line everywhere, but it means you get credit for that? It's like coming out. You're a veteran of sorts because military and civilian service ought to be two sides of the same coin. But at the end of the day, you're getting a better human being. You're getting a better employee. I think a lot of young people, there's the sense of impatience, you know, like I got to get my career going. I love the idea of volunteering for two years of doing something, you know, teaching in a school somewhere in America or volunteering for health care or whatever. But I feel like I'm going to lose two years. Other people will get ahead of me in this competition if I go do that. David, Mark does some interesting work where there's this belief to change behavior. First you have to change someone's thinking and then they'll change their behavior. And we see this in companies. You give the PowerPoint, you explain what we're doing, and then you hope people will come along. And his work has found that, no, you force a change in behavior and then people change their thinking. So mandating national service people will come along and realize how great it is. He's exactly right. The other conversation we have to get is the one where someone wants to run for office. And so they are bright, young and charismatic and ambitious. And they get in front of a bunch of people and, I want to be your congressman. And someone says, OK, how did you serve? And they look down at their shoes and they go, wow, you know, I was in this school, in law school and I didn't. And they go, Why are you running for office? Get out of here. I think that would be very powerful. I mean, it's true. And we see this in our politicians. Right, which is this is our complaint about politicians. Are they there to serve us? Are they there to win the game and serve themselves? I mean, where did they come from? Yeah, it also strikes me there's plenty of shared struggle right now in the United States. How come we're not coming together the way we should be? I mean, we seem to be dividing in the struggle rather than coalescing in the struggle. And do I have a romantic view of the way it used to be or is there actually something different now? I have the same view as you think about it. If you had written a movie about what would unite the world, what you would do is you'd create an external threat. Typically, think of one of those movies where aliens come and the world for the first time in a long time unites and it fights off the aliens and everything's good covid-19 like that. It's something everybody could hate. Nobody's going to love a virus that kills people. And it was a great opportunity to unite us internally and externally. You can't blame it on anybody. And yet the opposite has happened. What we've done is we've gone into smaller entities almost tribally and linked arms and we've done that. And as a consequence, we've done two things. One, we've been much less effective than we needed to be. And second, we've missed the opportunity to have a unifying theme that brings us together. And absent that, it's pretty easy for societies to fragment. And that's what I think is so dangerous right now. Now, it's also an opportunity. There's a lot of people having a conversation we are right now. And so I'm hoping that because that conversation is going on, that there are people saying, OK, where we have to do it. It raises the interesting question of sort of to use a modern term to put on it. But branding, you look at the quote unquote threats that we face and they've had really bad branding, like we call it, you know, global warming. Well, but we had a really bad winter. And I thought you told me it was warming or we call it climate change. But people confuse the weather and the climate. They're not the same thing. And why didn't we call it climate cancer? That sounds a lot worse to me. We've done a terrible job at communicating this existential threat. And so we're not. Coming together as a people and you know this for military, which is there is a sense of branding the enemy to brand the enemy as this disconnected threat that they no longer human there, there are now a threat. And so I wonder if we have a responsibility. Leaders have a responsibility to better communicate the threats that we have rather than explaining them. Yeah, but it seems to me that there's been a failure of communication from our leaders to help us understand the importance of these existential threats that would make us come together as a community. Yeah, I think that's true. If you think of the war on poverty that President Johnson pushed and that was pretty clear, you know, it was unevenly executed, but it's pretty clear. And now if we think about the push for equality in our society, it's kind of hard to be against philosophically, against the fact that everyone should have equal opportunity. Yeah, but we have not been able to explain that in a way where that's what we're forcing people to to talk about. We're talking about other things. And what we should be talking about is the idea that every young person gets a roughly equal start, roughly equal opportunity in life and. That's never going to be perfect, but it should be our goal. You shouldn't be able to argue against that. I think that's such an interesting point, which is to raise the conversation. We're down in the weeds and there's a bigger idea here. And Black Lives Matter has sparked something that is innate in all of us, which is we believe, in fairness, a little child, my little nephew, you know, something happens and he'll scream out to me that's unfair. Like it's innate. We have a sense of fairness in all of us. And the question is, is how do we advance this sense of to your point, everybody gets roughly the same start. What you do with your start is is up to you, I guess. But I don't even know if that's true. That's what Black Lives Matter is highlighted, which is OK, fine with the good and fair start. But it's not a fair ride. It's not a fair journey. But I do really appreciate this idea of raising the conversation. But who it's a great question. I mean, let's talk health care, for example. I think the conversation should start with every citizen is going to get health care, adequate health care for their whole life. And people say, well, wait a minute, are we talking about single payer Obamacare? Any number of permutations say, no, we're not talking about any of that. What we're talking about right now is do you agree with the idea that everybody gets health care? If they're bleeding, they get bandaged. If they're sick, they get taken care of and all the things you need and people, again, will go, well, yeah, OK. Of course they'd be careful because when you get into how you get in the arguments. But if we could get a general agreement that says every American gets health care, not just because it's fair, but because it's smart for society, it makes us a better society, then you start to work toward it. I think Obama made a mistake when he communicated this. I've gone back and watched. He gave a speech to a joint session of Congress, one of the first times he was making a national argument for national health care. And he made a rational argument. You know, there are 30 million uninsured Americans, you know, kind of how the speech started, which to anybody sounds big and complicated and sounds expensive as opposed to going to the foundations of the United States. You know, he could have stood up and said, our founding fathers founding this nation on three basic principles. All men are created equal, endowed with unalienable rights amongst which include life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Let's let's talk about one of those. Let's just talk about life. The United States is the wealthiest nation on earth. The United States has the most powerful nation on earth. Only our president is referred to as the leader of the free world. Then how is it that America has one of the highest infant mortality rates amongst Western nations? How is it that we can claim to provide life for all of our citizens and yet we cannot even provide a doctor for every child? There are 30 million uninsured Americans. And I think that, again, goes back to a failure of communication. He did not tap into a sense of shared something or other that all Americans have, regardless of color, creed and politics. He went straight into let me explain something to you. And I think this is where our leaders and our politicians have failed this. Everybody to explain things to us. I mean, you know, this war history, America is losing the psychological and social fight in Vietnam. And they're having press conferences saying how well they're doing in battle. Like the numbers don't matter. Yeah. You know, we lost 58000 men. They lost three million people. How did we lose? Right. Because we kept talking about it rationally. It doesn't work. And I think there's a complete breakdown in this nation of how we are able to connect with people, how we explain things or inspire. Right. And so here's the challenge. What should leaders be doing? Like how the heck are we going to inspire people to want to do something that comes at personal sacrifice? Yeah, I think people want to be inspired. The one thing that I think is true is they desperately want to be inspired. They're just sort of waiting to be asked. Yeah, I think Black Lives Matter is important on so many levels. There's the obvious one that we need to reconcile and hold a mirror up to ourselves as a society and and sort of admit we need to do a lot better. But I think it's provided an opportunity for people to show up. You know, I think people forget that the Internet is not what changes. Society know Mubarak was not overthrown by Twitter. He was overthrown by the thousands and thousands and thousands of people who showed up in Tahrir Square. It requires people to physically show up. And it's one of the things I love about this youngest generation, Gen Z is they're not online activists. They show up and they organize and they're having strikes from school to make a point. And they're building rallies themselves. They're an activist generation. And maybe this activist generation is in response. It is the pendulum to the slacktivism that has preceded them. Yeah, so and as I said, the Black Lives Matter movement, it's been a long time since America has had a movement, you know, where people came out on the streets and protested in massive, massive numbers at personal risk, I might add. And I agree with you on that completely. The one thing if I was advising Black Lives Matter is because I've written and studied the civil rights movement. They need to make sure they're not thinking about this, like about. It's a war, and so they have got to have enough persistent pressure on the system because we both know our country well enough that there'll be a certain response and then as soon as the pressure goes down, there will be stop progress and in fact, there be some encroachment back. And so they need to understand that Martin Luther King Jr. did it for 13 years till he was murdered and then other people led the movement. After that. It takes constant, inexorable pressure. Well, it goes back to our impatience as a society with younger, impatient generations. I got to get my career started and I got to see change now. And some of that's true. But as you said, societal change, sticky societal change that can survive the machinations of a political cycle takes time. Can you share a specific story that you went through, something we can relive with you, where you came out, a different version of yourself? Yeah, I was a captain for about seven years, so I had about 10 years in the Army and the first time in the army. When you can be promoted early, you get an accelerated promotion is to major. And so this board was coming up and I was going to be considered, along with thousands of other captains, and I didn't think much about it. You know, I didn't really think about it, but I'd had all the right jobs. In fact, I was already in a major job and people were telling me how cool I was and how well I was doing. And so part of me inside was going, hey, you know, I'm the kind of guy they pick early. And our day I was discount. That's the list came out. And my battalion commander called me and he said, you're not on the majors list. And I said, OK, I can live with that. I was hurt, but it was crushing until I saw the list and literally all my friends were on the list. Or it seemed like it seemed like every other captain that I knew really well was and I was not. And so now not being on was really noteworthy. And so it crushed me. And I remember my wife had been married three years now. But one of the things she said, it goes, OK, you didn't make it. So what are you going to do? You're going to get out of the army and I said no. And she says, well then you've got to get over it, because if you're not going to get out and I came away with this lifelong thing, I repeat to other people, I said, you know, every once in a while, if you get selected for promotion, you say, wow, the promotion board is really smart because they picked me. And I started reminding myself that later when I got picked for promotions, I said the board that picked me was no smarter than the board that. And so I need to take any success with the same grain of salt. I need to be as dismissive of the process as I was when I didn't get selected. It was good to happen so early in my career because it was a real slap back into humility that is so great. And I'm realizing just, you know, when something goes our way, we think how smart those people are and how good those people are. And when it doesn't go we think what idiots and what poor leaders they are and how they don't understand. And it's the same. They're either idiots all the time. And they picked you for a promotion because they're idiots or they're smart. They know something that you don't know. I really like the fact that we treated equally. That's such a good one. There's a great story that the chief of staff of the army once told, and he said every year they picked 40 colonels in the army to be brigadier generals. And that's the most difficult hurdle to get over twenty five hundred get looked at, 40 get picked. So it's really the eye of a needle. A lot of it's luck. And he said he was talking to a colonel one day and he said, well, what do you think about this boy coming up? He said, Sir, you know, every year when the 40 person list comes out, there's always one name that everybody looks at and goes, how did that idiot get on the list? What a joke. And he said, Sir, I want to be that guy. I love it. I love it. One of the things that I think most people misunderstand and misperceive about the military is, you know, sure, there's a lot of testosterone and it's a machismo culture, but the intensity of humanity that exists, there's handholding, there's hugging, there's crying and crying in the military is fine. Is there someone you think of a fallen comrade or a story that you grew up with that you can't get through the story? Is there something that has stuck with you that has become a part of who you are as Stan McChrystal? This story, this person in your life has now become a part of your the very way you show up in the world because you knew them or because of the story you lived through. There is Christmas Eve. It's tradition for commanders to fly around and visit remote bases, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day. So I was doing the Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. do more. So it was already dark and it was Afghanistan. And I'm at these little bases and I landed at a small little base, looked like a just for the Afghanistan thing, and probably 40, 50 Americans stationed there and 70 radio Afghan forces and together there to secure this local area. And so we land outside and we walk into the perimeter and we go into the mess hall and they've gathered most of the people there, my sergeant major, nine to three others. And we talk for a few minutes. Everybody is it's always the same. They're pretty tight at first. And then, you know, you talk informally and then the great, said, is anybody want to take any pictures or do anything? And then they'll want to take pictures together and that breaks it down. That's great. And so as I'm given my comments, I see a young private first class and I see the name. And literally I just froze because the name was back and it was a very distinct name. And there had been a Ranger Sergeant First Class that I had served with in the Ranger Regiment. I commend the regiment. And then he had gone off to Delta Force, become an operator. And then in, under my command, he was killed. I knew Steve and his wife quite well. And I'm sitting there and I'm looking at this guy. If this name tag is distracted by my comments and we went to the pictures, I went over to him and I said. your father in the service? And he could figure out where I was going with this right away, and he goes, yes, I said it was your father, Perenjori says, Yes, sir. And in that moment, what I realized is we're seeing this generational service. His father had been killed. This kid didn't have to go in. The military could have gone and done anything. But not only gone in the military here he was in this godforsaken part of Afghanistan on Christmas. His mom is now home alone. You know, she'd been widowed at that point for four and a half years. And I just realized that he didn't come and tell me, hey, you know, my dad. He wasn't going to do that, and I just happened to see it and it reminded me what sort of quiet service is would sacrifice what his father had done, what his mother was doing, and then what he was. And so it's one of those things that whenever I think about that, when people talk about, OK, you know, I'm doing my part, I say, OK, I'm sure you are. But I put it against that yardstick. A lot of the stories you tell are of quiet service. You tell the story of this young man as quiet service. You tell the story of your mother, of quiet service. You distinctly pointed out the quietness of her service. You talk about humility. A lot of the stories you tell are about quiet and about being humble. It's a theme in your work. It's a theme in the stories. And maybe that's what this is all about. Which is maybe the reason we've lost the sense of sacrifice is because we're all too busy advertising ourselves now. Maybe this has nothing to do with service. Maybe the lack of service is a symptom that we've lost our humility as individuals, as a nation. You know, I see that in the resume building in young people where there's more resume than substance and they've been encouraged to do that. I think we've got a celebrity culture where we can confuse celebrity with competence or leadership. So I think you're probably right. What I think is so funny about America. We celebrate our independence on July 4th, 1776, but we fought the Revolutionary War until the Treaty of Paris on September 3rd, 1783. We actually aren't celebrating our independence. We're celebrating the day we declared our independence. Independence didn't come for another seven years before the United States was formally recognized as an independent nation. But that's a very American thing. Yeah, the declaration is enough. And I think that, again, there's huge positives in that, you know, Europe makes fun of us because we're so optimistic as a nation. But I think the downside of that is we're sometimes so busy broadcasting that we're not spending enough time listening. We're so busy self promoting that sometimes we're forgetting the substance. And maybe this is just a point in time, an inflection point, a necessary point for correction. And sometimes maybe. Black Lives Matter, it's that smack across the face that says, you know, maybe you should maybe should be a little more quiet and a little more humble, like you didn't get everything right. America. Yeah. You got some things wrong. It's OK. You just got to take account. You got to make corrections and you got to you've got to learn your lesson. You've got to learn that humility. I think there's something really powerful about quiet service. And for somebody like you with a storied career, you could tell me any story you wanted. You could have told me a story of heroism and machismo and somebody running to battle. And the story you chose to tell me that you carry with you as someone you want to be like. Is this private first class with quiet service, maybe we all need to just like do that go serve as opposed to broadcasting what we served or intended to do? Yeah, Stan, I can't thank you enough and I'm not going to go into it. People can do their own research on your career, but knowing how the circumstances under which you left the army, you are that private first class. It was quiet and you allowed history to tell the right story and to get the truth out later on. I have great respect for just how quiet you are and just put your head down and get the job done. It's such a such an honor. Thanks for all you do and thanks for having me today. But even more thanks for you. Do you make people think sometimes that makes their heads hurt, but you make me think that's one of the biggest contributions you can make. Thank you, sir. I appreciate it. Take care some. If you enjoyed this podcast and if you'd like to hear more, please subscribe wherever you like to listen to podcasts. Until then, take care of yourself. Take care of each other.

Translation Word Bank
AdBlock detected!

Your Add Blocker will interfere with the Google Translator. Please disable it for a better experience.

dismiss